HallucinX verifies every case citation in your brief against CourtListener's database of over ten million opinions. Deterministic. Local-first. Explainable in court.
Your documents never leave your device. Citations are extracted from your brief in your browser. Only the citation strings — not the document text — are sent to CourtListener's public API to verify each case exists. The brief itself never transits to our servers or anyone else's.
“Ask your bar association if HallucinX is right for you.”
How it works
01
Upload a brief
PDF or DOCX. Drag and drop, or click to select. Your document is parsed in your browser and never leaves your device.
02
Check every citation
Citations are extracted from your brief in your browser. Only the citation strings — not the document text — are sent to CourtListener's public API to verify each case exists. Deterministic string matching. No AI in the verification path.
03
File with confidence
Download a color-coded report. Every citation is verified, flagged, or marked for manual review, with a clear reason for every status. File it alongside your brief as your audit trail.
See it catch the fabricated citations from the Mata v. Avianca brief.
In 2023, two attorneys were sanctioned after filing a brief in Mata v. Avianca that cited six cases that did not exist. ChatGPT had hallucinated them; the lawyers did not verify. HallucinX catches all six — with an explanation a judge would accept for each.
Page 6 of the LoDuca affirmation. The italicized Varghese and Zicherman case names and the indented quotation were fabricated by ChatGPT and filed without verification. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W.S. Ranch Co. are real and correctly cited.